Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Blog Article
I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was establishing a lot more pressure and was slower than the outdated things. I don't try to remember if I even tried out standard h4831 or not; I'm pondering not.
H4831SC Powder offered in inventory now. Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's got a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or quick Lower. The shorter, extra compact kernels allow the powder to movement throughout the powder actions much more smoothly, helping to alleviate the constant cutting of granules.
This is one of the greatest causes reloaders are admonished to utilize new data only; and to begin lower whenever you receive a brand new great deal of powder. You don't truly know (Except if the company lets you know so) that the new large amount of powder was even made at exactly the same manufacturing unit as the powder you got a number of years ago.
Sweet!! I'll choose some up and give it a consider. Thanks men, I value it! I'll Allow you to really know what I determine. I do have a few 50 % pound of 4350 I am able to attempt that very first and see what takes place.
Thornton, CO Supply of H4831SC is starting to dwindle down as well so get what you need for your new load I might advise. May be all of practically nothing when they restock everything Soon but All those powders are obtaining transport regulation challenges.
Any load data to help that? My to start with considered is it isn't about to burn every one of the way and velocities will probably be sluggish and far and wide. May very well be a good fireworks Screen!
Nampa, Idaho In my knowledge the only true difference is that the shortcut meters improved via reloading devices. As soon as It can be loaded theres no functional h4831sc distinction. I have read that the shortcut could have a little little bit quicker burn off level but it seems insignificant.
The SC or SSC selected powders Generally enable for greater load density, so you can ordinarily get a little bit far more powder within a presented situation when using compressed loads. Usage of a drop tube can further more raise this benefit.
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t pleased with the velocity. Just after months, I got lucky and caught some H1000 on the internet and naturally paid out slightly excess. The pretty h4831 vs h4831sc following 7 days at a gun demonstrate a guy had a whole situation of H1000 for $40 per 1lb. I neglect simply how much, but With all the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a gentle load.
The h4831sc 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they've got slowed down the swift to indicate that their rifles are greater. It bug the hell away from me. I do know greater. This is exactly why I don't at any time throw out my older manuals. I do purchase new handbook continuously to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I take advantage of this 39grs in summers @ 100+ degrees with none complications.
This really is an older thread, you may not receive a reaction, and could be reviving an previous thread. Remember to look at making a new thread.
It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Located a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 5 shot team currently. It can be slightly slower than H1000, but shoots fantastic. Thanks for the advice, It is good to know that I have received choices when one or one other powder is dried up.
I normally often get the sc Model. Using a powder evaluate it hangs up a lot less on account of shorter kernels and I feel allows much more constant metering so considerably less time you're taking trickling in the last little bit of cost to help make pounds. So fundamentally the SC saves you instances
I discovered that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min prices. I’m chatting 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it absolutely was a lower 60s grain charge inside of a Norma scenario. Not what I was on the lookout for, but precise nonetheless.